Gaza.

In recent days, the fragile ceasefire in Gaza has been broken by both sides. This is not unusual. Asking who shot first in this part of the world is like asking which came first – the chicken or the egg.

I did raise my eyebrows ever so slightly when I heard the other day that Israeli Prime Minister Ehud Olmert called for a deliberately disproportionate response from the Israeli Military. Seeing as there is a general consensus among the International community that the recent offensive against Gaza was already disproportionate and given that many aid agencies and International bodies are calling for War Crimes investigations, this statement seems to indicate not only a complete disregard for the Palestinian civilian population but an amazing arrogance on the part of the Israeli government. He might as well have taken the floor at the U.N. and given everyone the finger while telling them to go fuck themselves.

I wonder what this child’s parents would think about Olmert’s call for military action.

La Repubblica, Italy. Unaccredited as far as I can tell.

If that doesn’t turn your stomach, there is more.

This photograph was taken by the Palestinian co-ordinator of the International Campaign to end the siege on Gaza. She has titled her photographs: 'Gaza Terrorists'. 'In the end we will remember not the words of our enemies, but the silence of our friends'. These photos are one set of the photostream of the Free Gaza movement: www.freegaza.org

I have been thinking about the massive military offensive against the already oppressed people of Gaza a lot recently. Of course, much has been said about this conflict and the debate over who is right or wrong, guilty or innocent often gets in the way of the fact that over a million people are suffering unnecessarily. I don’t pretend to know all the details, but I do know that when I see photographs of children killed by the military, there is something deeply abhorrent about that military’s methods.

Among the many photographs of dead or wounded children this one stopped me in my tracks. Not the most explicit of pictures, it is instead a very calm if morbid scene. My initial reaction was that this may be a hospital so overstretched that this man has to lay his wounded children on the floor of a room also storing shrouded corpses. It is only when I read the caption, stating that these small children were killed in Israeli attack that it hit me. The serenity of the scene, and the fact that the man’s face is hidden, concealing from us any grief he might be displaying while bending over his children is more unsettling than any bloodied body being rushed by on a stretcher. Even more disturbing to me is the fact that the boy in the middle is wearing an outfit almost identical to one my son owns. My boy is not yet two years old, and many of his clothes are a little oversized on him, just like the two boys in this photo. For me, this image became one of the most haunting of the whole conflict. If I was living there – I thought – that could be me


5 January: Magdi al-Samuli mourns over the bodies of his children, killed by an Israeli tank shell

Photograph: Mahmud Hams/AFP

The press lapped up pictures of wounded or dead children. As the ones above clearly demonstrate, they are emphatically powerful. Picture Editor Sophie Batterby from the UK newspaper The Independent opened the debate up to readers. She defended the images they had published, while also stating that some images they received were too graphic to be used. As I was in the UK for a time during the attacks, I thought I’d post a few sample pages from The independent and also The Guardian – both of which are fairly liberal papers.



Both papers – and indeed other sections of the British press and the main television news – seem to be of the opinion that what Israel was doing was not right. The Independent even labeled the conflict ‘This Shameful War’. I got the distinct feeling that the sympathy of the reporters lay with the Palestinians (though not Hamas, which is an important distinction the Israelis appear to be unable to make).

This led to accusations of anti-Semitism on the part of the British Press. There were also those who thought the reporting was pro Israeli. From what I saw and read I can’t see how either claim could be true. The reports were definitely not pro Israeli and to say that reporting on a military offensive that kills civilians has anything to do with religious prejudice is ridiculous.

As Peter Wilby succinctly put it:

Not that the results of any journalistic investigation would have been acceptable to both sides. One side's context is the other side's lies and distortions. As any journalist knows, attempts at fairness and balance in the Middle East are doomed. Allowing the drama of visible events to dictate the coverage is probably the best course after all.

The article this paragraph is lifted from is called 'Why we have to let pictures tell the real story' and was accompanied in print by this photograph.



It shows photojournalists taking pictures of Israeli troops just outside of Gaza, because the Israeli government has banned journalists from entering the territory. Obviously, they didn’t want the international press taking pictures of the civilian casualties they caused. Unfortunately for them, these pictures came out of Gaza anyway. Israel denounced these images as Hamas propaganda – stating that Hamas controls and is responsible everything that happens in the Gaza Strip, even the civilian casualties themselves.

Even if this were true, it doesn’t change the fact that the Military action in Gaza caused the deaths of many hundreds of civilians thanks to its indiscriminate bombing campaign. Propaganda or not, that is a crime.

Some people, however, did not see these actions as crimes, but as something to be celebrated.

6 January: Orthodox Jews dance with Israeli soldiers at the Gaza border

Photograph: Menahem Kahana/AFP/Getty Images

Perhaps these Israelis were unaware of what the military was doing. Perhaps they thought the only people dying in Gaza were Hamas militants, the same ones who had been lobbing rockets in their general direction for years. They are on the Israeli side of the border, miles away from where the bombs are falling. What do they know?

Consider this bucolic scene. Watching the war unfold from a distance (though not as far away as the likes of myself, sitting more or less comfortably in a chair halfway around the world) these Jewish gentlemen may be discussing all manner of things. They could be saying how wonderful it is, or how awful. We shall never know. As a juxtaposition to the chaos undoubtedly unfolding at the base of that plume of smoke they are considering it strikes me as a startling comment on how far these neighbours are apart from each other, metaphorically speaking.

January 6: Orthodox Jews watch smoke rise above the northern Gaza Strip

Photograph: Pavel Wolberg/EPA

Some more images from the Israeli side of the border – including damage done by Hamas rockets - can be seen on Eduardo Castaldo’s website.

http://www.eduardocastaldo.com/gaza.htm

If the images of Israelis rejoicing while the slaughter continues are just as unbearable to you as those of murdered civilians, Max Blumenthal’s video report from a pro-Israeli rally garnered some opinions that may be shocking but not surprising, including calls to wipe out all Palestinians. In light of this, we can only assume that some of those Israelis who are celebrating are doing so because of the Palestinian deaths, civilian or otherwise. One other thing; calling for the extermination of a people? Surely that is genocide no? And shouldn’t the Jews – above all – know the horrors of what that can entail?

There were many other protests around the world, both in support and in condemnation of the Israeli offensive. I was too busy with other things to get out and photograph the London protests myself, but here is how some of them in the UK were reported, again in The Guardian and The Independent.




You can find some photographs of protests in London on Peter Marshall’s ‘London Diary’.

http://mylondondiary.co.uk/2009/01/jan07-04.htm

Opinions on this issue are clearly divided.

The standard line in this whole sorry affair is that Israel is just defending itself against a terrorist group bent on its destruction. This may be the case, but in responding to that perceived threat, Israel is actually committing mass murder, indiscriminately bombing civilians and militants alike. By the rule of law, international law, this is a crime. Whether Hamas is committing a similar crime in its untargeted rocket attacks on Israel – which it is - is completely irrelevant to the fact that Israel has committed war crimes and should be held accountable. I cannot believe there is even a serious debate on this issue.

The Israelis have frequently stated that any nation would respond in the same way. This is patently not true. Imagine if the British had responded to IRA bombings by destroying Ireland with Airstrikes. I’m not going to debate the morality of what the British actually did do in Ireland – plenty of which was criminal, but you get my point. What if Spain decided to Carpet bomb the Basque region in order to target the separatists there? I can’t imagine that would go down too well either. The truth is, Israel cares not what any other country or people think. The only opinion that counts is their own, and that of the United States, for it is the U.S who is the biggest supporter of Israel in terms of Military grants and financial backing. It comes as no surprise to me then that the U.S. media has on the whole rarely questioned the legitimacy of the Israeli attacks.

The following article on Al Jazeera’s English language site highlights how much of the reporting in the U.S. focused on support and justification for Israel’s actions.

http://english.aljazeera.net/focus/war_on_gaza/2009/01/20091585448204690.html

That said, there has of course been some excellent reporting on what is a difficult situation. Whatever you write or photograph regarding Israel/Palestine you will encounter criticism from both sides, often arguing that you are being biased towards the other. This just demonstrates to me how tangled the whole problem has become. Take this recent article for example:

http://www.nytimes.com/2009/02/04/world/middleeast/04gaza.html?_r=1&hp

Typically, the Israeli military claims it never targeted civilians while the Palestinians claim they saw unarmed civilians murdered in cold blood. Who would you believe? I guess that depends on whose side you are on…

As far as proportionality goes, the destruction wrought by Hamas rockets is minor when compared to the Israeli attacks. Consider the statistic regarding the death toll: 13 Israelis (4 of which were soldiers killed by their own side) against 1300 Palestinians. That is a 100 to 1 ratio. As illustration, consider these two images in regard to the comparative firepower of the two sides in this conflict.

January 6: Israelis scramble a street after a rocket from Gaza hit Sderot

Photograph: Anja Niedringhaus/AP

Beit Hanoun, 22 January, 2009: Palestinian children on donkey carts ride past houses destroyed during Israel's military offensive

Photograph: Patrick Baz/AFP

It is not just people who lost their lives. Animals were killed, crops and farms were destroyed, Gaza’s power station was bombed and the infrastructure was severely damaged.

Members of Hamas prayed in front of a ministry building destroyed in the offensive.

Photo: Tyler Hicks/The New York Times

Those who have survived this offensive will have to deal with the aftermath. There are never enough photographs of this. I am guessing a burned out orchard is not as visually arresting as a wounded child, but it is certainly an important and often overlooked aspect of war.

That this conflict will continue for a long time to come I am sure. As long as Israel and the U.S. continue to negotiate only with Fatah while condemning Hamas as a terrorist organization, as long as Israel lays siege to Gaza while destroying its people and infrastructure with weapons paid for by the U.S., as long as Hamas militants fire rockets, as long as Iranian extremism continues to support militant groups in the middle east, the hatred and violence will continue. The problem is complex, the solution is simple.

Boys placed a Palestinian flag atop a destroyed house in Jabaliya.

Photo: Tyler Hicks/The New York Times

3 comments:

Benjamin Chesterton said...

A great piece of writeing ... I wrote about it and linked to Photography Lot and your own website on www.duckrabbit.info/blog

Stan B. said...

'In the end we will remember not the words of our enemies, but the silence of our friends'.

Talk about deja vu- weren't those pretty much the same exact words and/or sentiments expressed by a certain oppreessed minority as Allied bombers blissfully flew past concentration camps in WWll?

Unfortunately, this current minority has no monied friends in high places to see them through- even if this insanity ever ends.

sexy said...

情趣用品,情趣用品,情趣用品,情趣用品,情趣用品,情趣用品,情趣,情趣,情趣,情趣,情趣,情趣,情趣用品,情趣用品,情趣,情趣,A片,A片,情色,A片,A片,情色,A片,A片,情趣用品,A片,情趣用品,A片,情趣用品,a片,情趣用品

A片,A片,AV女優,色情,成人,做愛,情色,AIO,視訊聊天室,SEX,聊天室,自拍,AV,情色,成人,情色,aio,sex,成人,情色

免費A片,美女視訊,情色交友,免費AV,色情網站,辣妹視訊,美女交友,色情影片,成人影片,成人網站,H漫,18成人,成人圖片,成人漫畫,情色網,日本A片,免費A片下載,性愛

情色文學,色情A片,A片下載,色情遊戲,色情影片,色情聊天室,情色電影,免費視訊,免費視訊聊天,免費視訊聊天室,一葉情貼圖片區,情色視訊,免費成人影片,視訊交友,視訊聊天,言情小說,愛情小說,AV片,A漫,AVDVD,情色論壇,視訊美女,AV成人網,成人交友,成人電影,成人貼圖,成人小說,成人文章,成人圖片區,成人遊戲,愛情公寓,情色貼圖,色情小說,情色小說,成人論壇


av女優,av,av片,aio交友愛情館,ut聊天室,聊天室,豆豆聊天室,色情聊天室,尋夢園聊天室,080聊天室,視訊聊天室,080苗栗人聊天室,上班族聊天室,成人聊天室,中部人聊天室,一夜情聊天室,情色聊天室,情色視訊

A片,A片,A片下載,做愛,成人電影,.18成人,日本A片,情色小說,情色電影,成人影城,自拍,情色論壇,成人論壇,情色貼圖,情色,免費A片,成人,成人網站,成人圖片,AV女優,成人光碟,色情,色情影片,免費A片下載,SEX,AV,色情網站,本土自拍,性愛,成人影片,情色文學,成人文章,成人圖片區,成人貼圖